<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Webmail Storage Quotas Redundant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/</link>
	<description>BizExcellerated Internet Marketing: Achieve mastery in blogging, affiliate marketing, social traffic generation at Andrew Wee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:28:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rachit</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-296601</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-296601</guid>
		<description>Actually I have to disagree ... I&#039;ve used my GMail account for about 3 years now and before GMail just raised their limit, I was at 97% (after I had to delete a lot of stuff to remain under 100%). 

And having that storage space has been a huge boon. Having my files backed up on Google&#039;s servers (which are distributed and backed up several times over), is actually much more reliable than my own computers (Windows dies, that&#039;s a reality). 

As for running out of space, it&#039;s not that hard. For example, I get powerpoint presentations, documents and PDF files in my gmail account. An average PPT runs 2-4 MB. Documents run 200KB to 2MB. PDF files are in the same range. And if I&#039;m working on this stuff with a team, I have to send and receive these thru my gmail account. With an average of 7-8 revisions for every PPT file, each presentation eats up 40+ MB in my account.

Of course, this doesn&#039;t include those which have audio add-ons. 

Now, many ppl don&#039;t see this happening because they primarily use one computer and use desktop software. But when we have computers at office, computers at home, a laptop for travelling, and ready Internet everywhere ... Web-based emails are more useful.

And if you exchange versions of any kind of documents, its not hard to fill up a few gigabytes. 

Of course, I agree that Google was using this as a selling point. But they really screwed up there. Initially, they had advertised an &quot;infinity + 1&quot; storage plan for Gmail (On their 2nd anniversary) .... 

But this year, they started asking people for money for more storage! That&#039;s like cheating ... I&#039;m glad that Yahoo &amp; MSN stepped up to offer great email solutions. Both Windows Live and the new Yahoo mail are very capable emails ... good enough to match Gmail feature for feature. 

So I guess we should be thanking Google for upping the stakes in the email game. I suppose it&#039;s harder for them to match their own standards of evolution now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I have to disagree &#8230; I&#8217;ve used my GMail account for about 3 years now and before GMail just raised their limit, I was at 97% (after I had to delete a lot of stuff to remain under 100%). </p>
<p>And having that storage space has been a huge boon. Having my files backed up on Google&#8217;s servers (which are distributed and backed up several times over), is actually much more reliable than my own computers (Windows dies, that&#8217;s a reality). </p>
<p>As for running out of space, it&#8217;s not that hard. For example, I get powerpoint presentations, documents and PDF files in my gmail account. An average PPT runs 2-4 MB. Documents run 200KB to 2MB. PDF files are in the same range. And if I&#8217;m working on this stuff with a team, I have to send and receive these thru my gmail account. With an average of 7-8 revisions for every PPT file, each presentation eats up 40+ MB in my account.</p>
<p>Of course, this doesn&#8217;t include those which have audio add-ons. </p>
<p>Now, many ppl don&#8217;t see this happening because they primarily use one computer and use desktop software. But when we have computers at office, computers at home, a laptop for travelling, and ready Internet everywhere &#8230; Web-based emails are more useful.</p>
<p>And if you exchange versions of any kind of documents, its not hard to fill up a few gigabytes. </p>
<p>Of course, I agree that Google was using this as a selling point. But they really screwed up there. Initially, they had advertised an &#8220;infinity + 1&#8243; storage plan for Gmail (On their 2nd anniversary) &#8230;. </p>
<p>But this year, they started asking people for money for more storage! That&#8217;s like cheating &#8230; I&#8217;m glad that Yahoo &amp; MSN stepped up to offer great email solutions. Both Windows Live and the new Yahoo mail are very capable emails &#8230; good enough to match Gmail feature for feature. </p>
<p>So I guess we should be thanking Google for upping the stakes in the email game. I suppose it&#8217;s harder for them to match their own standards of evolution now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-288863</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-288863</guid>
		<description>you are right Andrew.

I guess it just depends on the amount of money someone is willing to spend on email storage.

BTW, I can&#039;t wait to get my hands on the cool product you and Amit are working on right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right Andrew.</p>
<p>I guess it just depends on the amount of money someone is willing to spend on email storage.</p>
<p>BTW, I can&#8217;t wait to get my hands on the cool product you and Amit are working on right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wee</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-283687</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-283687</guid>
		<description>Seems a little counter-intuitive to create multiple emails just to save a little.

I think that $10-20 is something well spent.

I continue to pay a crazy price to maintain my email (with a 10mb quota) at my old ISP from the early 90s, just because people still mail me there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems a little counter-intuitive to create multiple emails just to save a little.</p>
<p>I think that $10-20 is something well spent.</p>
<p>I continue to pay a crazy price to maintain my email (with a 10mb quota) at my old ISP from the early 90s, just because people still mail me there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wee</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-283684</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-283684</guid>
		<description>unfortunately, i am experiencing a lot of inertia against picking up linux, php, or any other coding...

I have a couple of greasemonkey texts around, but it&#039;ll be some time till i get to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately, i am experiencing a lot of inertia against picking up linux, php, or any other coding&#8230;</p>
<p>I have a couple of greasemonkey texts around, but it&#8217;ll be some time till i get to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-283272</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-283272</guid>
		<description>Sam,

you know you can always get a second gmail account. 
that way you won&#039;t have to pay extra for the storage.
back in &#039;04 it was kinda hard to get 2 gmail accounts but now that&#039;s it&#039;s one for all and all for one, it&#039;s quite easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,</p>
<p>you know you can always get a second gmail account.<br />
that way you won&#8217;t have to pay extra for the storage.<br />
back in &#8216;04 it was kinda hard to get 2 gmail accounts but now that&#8217;s it&#8217;s one for all and all for one, it&#8217;s quite easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jen_chan, writer SureFireWealth.com</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-282972</link>
		<dc:creator>jen_chan, writer SureFireWealth.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-282972</guid>
		<description>I often wonder about that. While I do not have a gmail account, Yahoo! does provide a large quota space for its users. I never even make it to the middle. But you gave an interesting thought. What if they&#039;re all getting ready for something much bigger than just writing messages and attaching files? You never know what they will spring on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often wonder about that. While I do not have a gmail account, Yahoo! does provide a large quota space for its users. I never even make it to the middle. But you gave an interesting thought. What if they&#8217;re all getting ready for something much bigger than just writing messages and attaching files? You never know what they will spring on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson &#187; GMail Lockdown</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-282052</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson &#187; GMail Lockdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-282052</guid>
		<description>[...] learn me, eh?Ã‚Â  Especially after I left a few glowing comments about GMail on Andrew Wee&#8217;s post about GMail memory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] learn me, eh?Ã‚Â  Especially after I left a few glowing comments about GMail on Andrew Wee&#8217;s post about GMail memory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-281930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-281930</guid>
		<description>Yep, everything is backed up and packed away nicely just in case.  Always a good idea!

As to the features point, you can do a great deal with GreaseMonkey scripts in Firefox.  That&#039;s not immediately user friendly or available to casual users, but if you&#039;ve got a little hacker in your blood, you can do wonders with GreaseMonkey and GMail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, everything is backed up and packed away nicely just in case.  Always a good idea!</p>
<p>As to the features point, you can do a great deal with GreaseMonkey scripts in Firefox.  That&#8217;s not immediately user friendly or available to casual users, but if you&#8217;ve got a little hacker in your blood, you can do wonders with GreaseMonkey and GMail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wee</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-281924</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-281924</guid>
		<description>Sam,
Have you backed up all your jun, er, stuff in there?

Losing 3gb of work and personal memories can be really painful.

You&#039;d think with all the new-fangled stuff that&#039;s taking place, email ought to at least implement tag clouds, automated mail filters, ajax tech...ok, don&#039;t get me started...

Text messaging and integrated VOIP is great, but...the bread and butter issues need to be taken care of first, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam,<br />
Have you backed up all your jun, er, stuff in there?</p>
<p>Losing 3gb of work and personal memories can be really painful.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think with all the new-fangled stuff that&#8217;s taking place, email ought to at least implement tag clouds, automated mail filters, ajax tech&#8230;ok, don&#8217;t get me started&#8230;</p>
<p>Text messaging and integrated VOIP is great, but&#8230;the bread and butter issues need to be taken care of first, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Harrelson</title>
		<link>http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/comment-page-1/#comment-281916</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Harrelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/email-marketing/are-webmail-storage-quotas-redundant/#comment-281916</guid>
		<description>I actually had to pay for more storage for my GMail account since I was getting close to maximum!  

I&#039;ve had my account since a couple  of days after their launch in &#039;04 and it&#039;s full of all sorts of old emails and files.  I honestly use GMail as my storage box / external &quot;cloud drive&quot; and keep all sorts of things (files, pics, .zips, notes, etc) in there.  You just can&#039;t beat the search function there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had to pay for more storage for my GMail account since I was getting close to maximum!  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had my account since a couple  of days after their launch in &#8216;04 and it&#8217;s full of all sorts of old emails and files.  I honestly use GMail as my storage box / external &#8220;cloud drive&#8221; and keep all sorts of things (files, pics, .zips, notes, etc) in there.  You just can&#8217;t beat the search function there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
