Comments on: BlogRush: Is Network Marketing-Based Traffic Generation A Waste Of Time?

By: Link

Link — Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:14:43 +0000

I wrote a lengthy, by my standards, look at BlogRush today and I pretty much agree with everything you’ve said here. You can drive a semi truck through the holes in the system BlogRush has in its current state. Having said that, I think it’s salvageable for people running blogs in categories that haven’t been totally ruined by its referral system yet.

By: Geordie Carswell

Geordie Carswell — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:16:11 +0000

How can something that looks so cool not be gold;)

By: lee

lee — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:59:36 +0000

hey andrew the link to JIM Kukral is not as link .
u link to wordpress gobala website ???

By: BibleJohn

BibleJohn — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:10:12 +0000

I’m not a blogger so I don’t have a horse in this race, but here are the two key points about Blog Rush:

1. As you mention, if you write a great headline, you’ll get more clicks, and hence more impressions. As you also point out, ‘great’ doesn’t mean high CTR, it means high quality and hence high conversion. Same principle as Adwords.
2. If you don’t have a lot of readership, you lose, even if you have a high CTR on your BlogRush impressions.

I’d be careful with it.

By: Becky

Becky — Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:56:26 +0000

Thanks for the great read. I am a newbie and I have just been joining everything, spreading myself really thin just trying to get traffic and do what everyone else is doing. You gave some great insight and I will begin to be more selective and concentrate on traffic quality instead of traffic quantity.