jump to navigation

PPV-To-CPA Case Study Kicks Off February 7, 2010

Posted by Andrew Wee in : affiliate marketing , trackback

This is the first in a series of posts for a PPV/CPV (pay per view/cost per view) case study that I’m doing. You’re welcome to follow along and launch your own campaigns too.

With PPC networks increasingly bringing the hammer down on affiliate marketers marketing offers with thin affiliate sites, the past couple of months have seen affiliates jump from PPC to PPV and media buy campaigns. Particularly for newbie affiliates, it could be a case of jumping out of the pan and into the fire. Here’s a tip: it’s not the new traffic source that sucks, it’s probably your marketing strategy.

Compared to running ads on a search engine results (which can be considered a form of “permission marketing” because the user is specifically looking for information or products), ppv is considered a form of interruptive marketing. Unless your ad is a heckuva lot more interesting than whatever site or keyword they were headed to, they’re likely to skip or close down your window and go to wherever they were headed to.

PPV: Pathway to the Golden Land?

Do a search for “PPV Marketing” and you’ll find that PPV is discussed at newbie internet marketing forum, the Warrior Forum. Sounds like a mixed bag of results, with some of the forum members spending $100 and not seeing a single conversion, while other newbies have spent $10 and got some conversions. Still others have posted that they have spent $200 and are convinced that PPV “doesn’t work”.

Just because someone said that PPV is “easier” than PPC doesn’t mean everyone can expect a commission bonanza. Just like everything else, it’s the guys who’re running tests, tracking results, optimizing that are getting good results from this form of traffic. I know of marketers who’re using the TrafficVance network, which is considered by many to provide among the highest quality of leads totally bomb with their campaigns, so sometimes it’s the human, not the network that’s at fault.

What’s PPV?

Pay-Per-View (also known as Cost-Per-View) is advertising delivered primarily via pop-up (pops over the target website), interstitial pages (which appear in between the user’s original page and their destination/intended webpage), or pop-under (which are similar to pop-ups, except they appear under the intended webpage).

The ad pricing is based on a “per view” basis, meaning each time the ad is displayed (or “popped”), you’re charged the amount you bid, which can range from $0.005 to upwards of a dollar or more. The destination URL typically doesn’t appear in the popped window, so the user doesn’t know which website he’s seeing the ad from. Also, if you use low grade webhosting, and the server can’t serve up the ad fast enough (particularly if it’s a high traffic website you’re popping traffic over), the user might see a blank white page also known as a “white screen of death”, or even worse, an error message saying that your cheap webhosting account has exceeded it’s quota of server resources.

Which is the “best” form of pop-up to use?

Newbie PPV marketers should consider pop-ups if they’re getting into the game, as the best balance of marketing effectiveness and pricing. Interstitials may be more expensive, while pop-unders being cheaper will give poorer results unless you know what you’re doing.

Direct link or landing page?

If you’re starting out, you might like to go for low hanging fruit, and direct link to offer with landing pages that convert well. Go ask your affiliate manager (if they’re experienced) for tips, or check with other affiliates.

Even though direct linking might be arbitrage-based and not be as good as collecting an opt-in and building a long term asset, I feel that it’s a good starting point for new PPVers.

Direct linking works best with simple lead gen (CPA) offers. If you’ve a pay-per-sale product, using PPV will likely fail, particularly if you’re using a long form sales letter (as I’ve seen some merchants try to do with PPV traffic…) unless it’s something the lead is very interested in. Hosting your own landing pages are necessary to pre-sell some types of CPA offers, but we’ll kick off the study with direct linking.

Campaign Budgeting

Even though the minimum cost per view might be $0.005 at some networks, assuming you’re going to be rich beyond your wildest dreams on a budget of $10 is unrealistic. I’d suggest a budget of at least $100, so you can get your feet wet (be mentally ready to burn it all away while testing the system and getting used to campaigns).

A number of PPV marketers who’re generating 4- to 5-figure net profit days now burned through thousands of dollars when they were learning the ropes.

I’ll show a couple of techniques so you can control your cash outflow/expenditure and last a little longer in the game.

Offer Selection:

Although some would suggest starting with zip/email submit offers as a first campaign, I’d suggest you do your due diligence. Some of these regpath offers have a requirement to fill in page 4 or page 5, so don’t make the noob assumption you will automatically get paid on the page 1 completion. Some advertisers are known to scrub their submit leads pretty brutally, so if you know your affiliate manager pretty well, you can check with them.

I’m planning to go with the dating niche with this case study and use direct linking.

What do I need?

If you want to get started, here’s a list of resources I’ll be using:

I’ll continue to publish updates as the case study proceeds (one update, possibly two per week).

UPDATE: Check out the next post in the series – CPA Offer/PPV campaign setup and launch

Popularity: 8%

RSS feed | Trackback URI

14 Comments »

Comment by jonas Subscribed to comments via email
2010-02-07 20:32:39

Does most offers let you drive traffic via direct linking from PPV, or is it a looked down upon traffic source? How do you know if a particular offer accepts PPV traffic?

Comment by Andrew Wee
2010-02-08 09:16:54

You have to see what forms of promotion are allowed for the offers. terms like “adware”, “contextual”, “downloadable software” is an indication that PPV/CPV traffic is allowed. I’d suggest confirming with the product owner/affiliate maanger.

There’s some negative publicity associated with PPV/CPV (not entirely justified in my opinion). Some marketers have launched browser toolbars (especially for IE) that redirect product links via their aff link and this results in affiliate commission theft. I’ll cover this in a future post.

In general, if you’re promoting pay-per-lead/lead gen offers through the CPA networks, you’re generally ok.

If you’re not sure, please check with your aff manager

 
 
Comment by Nimit Kashyap Subscribed to comments via email
2010-02-08 00:47:17

good post, haven’t tried PPV yet…maybe try it soon.

 
Comment by AffExpert
2010-02-08 02:41:30

Seems like ppv is the hottest trend lately.
Good intro post though!

Comment by Andrew Wee
2010-02-08 09:17:39

Hey Besmir,
Good to see you here.

 
 
Comment by PPV 1-2-3 Subscribed to comments via email
2010-02-08 22:02:33

Hey Andrew, Great introduction article. Glad to see that you recommended David’s PPV Playbook. He also has a coaching forum that is really gaining a lot of traction. In the last two weeks it has doubled in size.

I have not seen LP Jan’s work before. Thanks for the scoop…

~ Corey

Comment by Andrew Wee
2010-02-08 22:56:09

Hey Corey,
Thanks for stopping by. Good work with AffPortal.com.

Yeah, David has both the PPV training series and the ongoing forum. I’m using just the training series for this case study, so people can see how (relatively) easy it is to get started.

In a later stage, I’ll see about including more advanced tools like AffPortal, PPV123 and David’s membership forum.

Comment by PPV 1-2-3 Subscribed to comments via email
2010-02-09 03:53:17

Thanks Andrew, that would be great. I’ll send you a link for the webinar replays. Our first one is scheduled for this Thursday.

 
 
 
Comment by proson
2010-02-09 17:21:21

Hi Andrew, I haven’t started PPV yet but I have already experiences some PPV ads through the download of LoudMo. Now I know how do they make money by giving away the install.

Proson

 
Comment by Josh Todd
2010-02-10 00:02:12

That’s an excellent point about permission-based vs interruptive marketing. A lot of guys getting into PPV don’t understand this initially, that’s why they get frustrated.

 
 
 
 
 
Name
E-mail
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.
Related posts
  • PPV Case Study – What’s Next?
  • Friday Podcast: PPC Strategies With Andrew Payne
  • PPV Case Study Day 7 – Tracking and Bid Management
  • PPV Case Study – Campaign Set Up And Launch
  • PPV Case Study – Analyzing Stats, Expanding Campaign + Interview with PPV Playbook’s David Ford
  • Bad Behavior has blocked 2719 access attempts in the last 7 days.

    ss_blog_claim=31fe8a8040ce4d594faa16b51cf3ce16