Comments on: PPV Case Study – Wrap Up and Conclusions

By: semanticppv

semanticppv — Fri, 02 Dec 2011 05:24:20 +0000

Happy to learn about ppv case study, I am in the field of ppv design and coding, this post help me to get more about ppv design and implementation. Thanks for your hard work.

By: PPV Advertising: Network Reviews and Case Studies - Affiliate Marketing Tips from Super Affiliate Zac Johnson | Affiliate Marketing Tips from Super Affiliate Zac Johnson

Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:41:23 +0000

[...] seperate PPV networks, then rated his performance and results for each. Which network was top rated?PPV Case Study – Andrew Wee breaks down the results of his PPV campaign, along with some helpful tips and [...]

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:05:16 +0000

I would put my efforts into Seo but Facebook is looking pretty good for ppc. guestlist for vegas clubs

By: Attorney Carolann Yellen

Attorney Carolann Yellen — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:33:29 +0000

Great point. I certainly agree. Well stated!

By: Attorney Cassi Sokolski

Attorney Cassi Sokolski — Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:30:11 +0000

You raise a very valid point. I appreciate how you articulated this.

By: Nicola Tewhare

Nicola Tewhare — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:55:59 +0000

Maybe your spend was too small forthe amount of urls you permitted. It did not give you enoughtime to do your testing. Thanks for the share though

By: Jin Roh

Jin Roh — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:31:46 +0000

I use linksador.com and trafficvance.com. Much better than direct cpv conversion wise. Direct cpv claims that they dont outsource their traffic but they use a lot of publishers to show their ads.

By: PPV Case Study – What’s Next? | Andrew Wee | Blogging | Affiliate Marketing | Social Traffic Generation | Internet Marketing

Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:20:55 +0000

[...] PPV Case Study – Wrap Up and Conclusions [...]

By: Justin Dupre

Justin Dupre — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:28:49 +0000

Yo Andrew, I really like your case study but I gotta tell you, Zac Johnson had one of the best case studies of the year… of the year!

By: Mike Chiasson

Mike Chiasson — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:43:32 +0000

Thanks for sharing Andrew. I also gave DirectPPV a try this week and my results weren’t so hot. I haven’t been too impressed with their Domain targeted traffic yet (granted I haven’t tried out the big domains yet). Their keyword specific traffic isn’t that bad though, granted I am basing this on some very small niche keywords here. Of course you can go read all about my fail at keyword targeting with DirectPPV on my blog lol. Keep up the good work!

By: andrew wee

andrew wee — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:40:20 +0000

Aside from showing that you obviously did not read the posts, and mistakenly think that dropping a link to your “Acne treatment” site would drive some traffic, you should realize that I don’t care about my feedburner follower count.

My expense is a dollar amount.
Your quality score is something different.
What’s the correlation?

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:47:24 +0000

What lessons were there to learn other than your PPV campaign was a failure? There was nothing positive to take out of this case study other than your feedburner account getting boosted with a couple more newbies.

Your whole case study was $7.47… I have quality scores higher than that.

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:41:49 +0000

Fail!

By: andrew wee

andrew wee — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:32:15 +0000

Hey Earl,
Great to see you post here.

I think most of us who have been doing this for some time will know that if some of the stuff you’re doing works out, you’re doing pretty well already.

There’s no point in doing “case studies” where numbers are fudged or an already successful campaign is retroactively analyzed.

It’s also funny that most are choosing to look at the numbers alone without looking at the lessons learned along the way.

By: Nick

Nick — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:00:40 +0000

You’re wrong. If this was a test then the numbers were not big enough to give any significance (so a fail) and if this campaign actually worked (i.e. broke even) with those numbers you would never be able to make any money with that trickle of traffic.

Forget 200,000 targets, 100 – 200 max